There's more to man boobs than meets the eye

Three High Court judges debating the sexual allure of man boobs is the stuff of music hall. The Court of Appeal has just overturned the conviction of a homosexual care worker who filmed another man at a swimming pool. He could not have been found guilty of voyeurism under the 2003 Sexual Offences Act, because the male chest is not accorded the same privacy as female breasts.

The Sexual Offences Act fastens on female breasts as an impenetrable sanctum, yet women have become fairly careless about exposing them

The most outdated aspect of the Act is the assumption that only women can be sexual objects.

How can we talk about unique lasciviousness towards the female form when you have David Beckham posing in his underpants on gigantic billboards in city centres?

And judges still believe in the exclusive sanctity of the female breast. Bless them.

Good-looking young men have the option of being gawped at and squeezed and given pocket money